<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Religulous Review</title>
	<atom:link href="http://midwesthumanists.com/2009/02/24/religulous-review/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://midwesthumanists.com/2009/02/24/religulous-review/</link>
	<description>An Irish Atheist and Humanist Community</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 May 2012 06:52:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Wiggins</title>
		<link>http://midwesthumanists.com/2009/02/24/religulous-review/#comment-478</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Steve Wiggins]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 16:38:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://midwesthumanists.com/?p=565#comment-478</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I had been waiting for the movie to become affordable before seeing it; since I teach religious studies sometimes I thought I could use it for class. I finally got around to it last month.

Your review is quite good. As a &quot;specialist&quot; in religion I found myself agreeing with Maher on many points, but I also found his unwillingness to take on any serious scholars a little disconcerting. Not that I trust scholars that much! He could have made a stronger case if he&#039;d taken on the big boys.

Also, I wondered how seriously we are meant to take the dire ending when it is pronounced by a comedian. Every time I&#039;ve watched it, the ending gets me &quot;right there&quot; because I know the scenario isn&#039;t that outlandish. Nevertheless, as I suggest on my blog, religion may still have a safe place in society. I&#039;m just not sure where it is.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I had been waiting for the movie to become affordable before seeing it; since I teach religious studies sometimes I thought I could use it for class. I finally got around to it last month.</p>
<p>Your review is quite good. As a &#8220;specialist&#8221; in religion I found myself agreeing with Maher on many points, but I also found his unwillingness to take on any serious scholars a little disconcerting. Not that I trust scholars that much! He could have made a stronger case if he&#8217;d taken on the big boys.</p>
<p>Also, I wondered how seriously we are meant to take the dire ending when it is pronounced by a comedian. Every time I&#8217;ve watched it, the ending gets me &#8220;right there&#8221; because I know the scenario isn&#8217;t that outlandish. Nevertheless, as I suggest on my blog, religion may still have a safe place in society. I&#8217;m just not sure where it is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jay Jigga</title>
		<link>http://midwesthumanists.com/2009/02/24/religulous-review/#comment-338</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jay Jigga]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Mar 2009 12:19:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://midwesthumanists.com/?p=565#comment-338</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Just watched it last night. I wasn’t expecting much, especially after the review here.

I initially wanted to turn it off. It’s pretty pathetic and disheartening to watch the deluded masses at the beginning, so out of their little minds on a concoction of rapture, desperation and stupidity. Nothing can reach these idiots. Reason seems to bounce off their mental buffers with ease. But ridicule hits the spot, so it was nice to hear Maher fearlessly busting their balls and calling them on their bullshit.

The spliced in silly footage matched and countered the surreal absurdity of the primates in it indulging in creation myths too stupid to belong in any fantasy tv series, and generally the espousal of ideas that can only be described as profoundly, supremely, and frighteningly retarded (e.g. those guys trying to circumvent the Sabbath laws, hooooolllleeeyyy shit). They deserve our ridicule and scorn and contempt.

I thought Religulous was decent, if a tad formulaic and over-spread. Some good laughs in there, and a serious, important message at the end.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just watched it last night. I wasn’t expecting much, especially after the review here.</p>
<p>I initially wanted to turn it off. It’s pretty pathetic and disheartening to watch the deluded masses at the beginning, so out of their little minds on a concoction of rapture, desperation and stupidity. Nothing can reach these idiots. Reason seems to bounce off their mental buffers with ease. But ridicule hits the spot, so it was nice to hear Maher fearlessly busting their balls and calling them on their bullshit.</p>
<p>The spliced in silly footage matched and countered the surreal absurdity of the primates in it indulging in creation myths too stupid to belong in any fantasy tv series, and generally the espousal of ideas that can only be described as profoundly, supremely, and frighteningly retarded (e.g. those guys trying to circumvent the Sabbath laws, hooooolllleeeyyy shit). They deserve our ridicule and scorn and contempt.</p>
<p>I thought Religulous was decent, if a tad formulaic and over-spread. Some good laughs in there, and a serious, important message at the end.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: stilldoubting</title>
		<link>http://midwesthumanists.com/2009/02/24/religulous-review/#comment-307</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[stilldoubting]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 16:38:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://midwesthumanists.com/?p=565#comment-307</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nice review Sully, I enjoyed the film, I found it very funny, and like you, I enjoy Real-Time.  That being said however, I find Maher to be hypocritical when he takes a serious angle, as you rightly point out, he has some wacky views, and i wonder sometime is he just a contrarian masquerading as an rationalist when it comes to religion.  But the film was entertaining no doubts, if a little simplistic and it&#039;s a pity he did not find anyone who had given religion a bit of thought before he ridiculed both them, and their superstition.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice review Sully, I enjoyed the film, I found it very funny, and like you, I enjoy Real-Time.  That being said however, I find Maher to be hypocritical when he takes a serious angle, as you rightly point out, he has some wacky views, and i wonder sometime is he just a contrarian masquerading as an rationalist when it comes to religion.  But the film was entertaining no doubts, if a little simplistic and it&#8217;s a pity he did not find anyone who had given religion a bit of thought before he ridiculed both them, and their superstition.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Hoge</title>
		<link>http://midwesthumanists.com/2009/02/24/religulous-review/#comment-306</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[The Hoge]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 10:24:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://midwesthumanists.com/?p=565#comment-306</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;ve been meaning to watch this for a while, sounds very interesting, I&#039;ll definitely give it a look now.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been meaning to watch this for a while, sounds very interesting, I&#8217;ll definitely give it a look now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

