<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Atheist Ireland Publishes 25 Blasphemous Quotes</title>
	<atom:link href="http://midwesthumanists.com/2010/01/01/atheist-ireland-publishes-25-blasphemous-quotes/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://midwesthumanists.com/2010/01/01/atheist-ireland-publishes-25-blasphemous-quotes/</link>
	<description>An Irish Atheist and Humanist Community</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 May 2012 06:52:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rick Nunnelley Jr.</title>
		<link>http://midwesthumanists.com/2010/01/01/atheist-ireland-publishes-25-blasphemous-quotes/#comment-743</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rick Nunnelley Jr.]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Feb 2011 18:52:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://midwesthumanists.com/?p=971#comment-743</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have written an album about peace from a free thinking mind. I thought you may enjoy it. Please check it out. PeaceofRock.net]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have written an album about peace from a free thinking mind. I thought you may enjoy it. Please check it out. PeaceofRock.net</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: God of War</title>
		<link>http://midwesthumanists.com/2010/01/01/atheist-ireland-publishes-25-blasphemous-quotes/#comment-587</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[God of War]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Apr 2010 07:01:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://midwesthumanists.com/?p=971#comment-587</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Cheers, nice blog.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cheers, nice blog.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patricia Yorck</title>
		<link>http://midwesthumanists.com/2010/01/01/atheist-ireland-publishes-25-blasphemous-quotes/#comment-565</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Patricia Yorck]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 05:54:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://midwesthumanists.com/?p=971#comment-565</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nice Website. You should think more about RSS Feeds as a traffic source. They bring me a nice bit of traffic.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice Website. You should think more about RSS Feeds as a traffic source. They bring me a nice bit of traffic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tom sheepandgoats</title>
		<link>http://midwesthumanists.com/2010/01/01/atheist-ireland-publishes-25-blasphemous-quotes/#comment-520</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[tom sheepandgoats]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Jan 2010 23:29:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://midwesthumanists.com/?p=971#comment-520</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Few have been more critical of religious organizations over the years than Jehovah&#039;s Witnesses. Yet they are universally recognized as a nonviolent people. They&#039;re &#039;weapons&#039; are words only. 

Would that all followed that example. Then you could have groups of uncompromising principles existing side by side with like groups espousing different principles. And you wouldn&#039;t need silly laws such as this one, which carry so much potential for abuse.

It&#039;s the only practical way in a pluralistic society.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Few have been more critical of religious organizations over the years than Jehovah&#8217;s Witnesses. Yet they are universally recognized as a nonviolent people. They&#8217;re &#8216;weapons&#8217; are words only. </p>
<p>Would that all followed that example. Then you could have groups of uncompromising principles existing side by side with like groups espousing different principles. And you wouldn&#8217;t need silly laws such as this one, which carry so much potential for abuse.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s the only practical way in a pluralistic society.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

