• Archives

  • Categories

  • Named one of the top Atheist / Agnostic Blogs by Unreasonable Faith
  • Recent Comments

    nancyabramsblogger's avatarnancyabramsblogger on World Blasphemy Day
    peterohara's avatarpeterohara on Respect for persons; no respec…
    Shane's avatarShane on Respect for persons; no respec…
    Laura's avatarLaura on Constitutional Convention Dead…
    peterohara's avatarpeterohara on HAI’s EGM on 26 June 201…
  • Meta

  • Wikipedia Affiliate Button

Friday Music – Rat Race by The Specials

For no reason I can think of this song has been in my head all week.

About that meeting…

From: Sully
To: Jason, dj357, drorgasm, stilldoubting
Subject: About that meeting…

Pssssst…

You might have noticed my conspicuous absence from last month’s meeting (the lack of narcissism-fuelled interruptions whilst people were talking might have brought it to your attention).

I gave the meeting a miss in favour of spending a week in the US of A, enjoying Thanksgiving with my ladyfriend, but now I’m worried that I’m missing out on some vital info! Good thing you guys were there! Any chance you could give me a little cheat sheet so nobody notices? I’ll make it worth your while!

Just do me a favour – don’t tell Larry. Remember that time he caught me passing notes during a meeting and put me cleaning toilets for a week? I shudder to think at what he’d do if he found out that I went mitching to partake in yet another holiday that has had its true origins scrubbed from the public consciousness…

So what’d I miss last month?

Oh Hell…

Further to my posting of the song “I’m An Atheist (And I’m Okay)” on youtube, a lovely user by the name of wfl18 posted many curious comments on the video page to which both myself and BipedalHumanoid (a member of Atheist Ireland) replied in an attempt to coax some reason out of this person’s mind. It appears from the rest of the comments that we were unsuccessful, as you can see here.

This was the last comment I left yesterday in response to wfl18:

you can hear bible verse all you want, but please don’t be so daft as to actually believe that they are worth listening to. oh and by the way, you said you COULD provide me non-scriptural evidence for the existence of hell….where is it….?

After I posted that last response, wfl18 then sent me a message on youtube this morning that included this link http://www.av1611.org/hell.html. I followed it, and was presented with some laughable anecdotal “evidence” for the existence of hell which is itself, surprisingly enough, based upon Biblical scripture.

I replied not long ago with this lengthy response:

This is nothing but anecdotal evidence based SPECIFICALLY on a biblical interpretation. During death, the brains neurons fire in a cacophonous assault on the mind and anything can be taken from this e.g. life flashing before ones eyes, a vision of the reaper, a vision of hell or even heaven, but either way, if you think this constitutes UNDENIABLE, VERIFIABLE and SUBSTANTIVE evidence that hell exists then you are either a fool or you don’t understand the definition of those words.

I cannot prove to you that hell does not exist, but since there is little or no substantial evidence for its existence, the rational stance is to maintain that it does not exist until the required evidence comes to light, and so therefore the burden of proof for its existence lies upon you. As of yet, you have given me nothing to prove in ANY way that hell exists. It MIGHT exist, but you haven’t given me any rerason to think that it does.

Oh, and by the way, if someone, even you had ACTUAL evidence that hell existed, I would be willing to hear it. And I am open to any evidence that is reliable, verifiable and predictable.

Let me put it to you this way, if a stranger came up to to tell you that your wife was secretly dying of a terminal illness and hasn’t told you about it, just how much evidence would you need before you actually believed what this person was telling you? If he showed you a book written thousands of years ago by a bunch of sheep herders that specified that someone of your vague description i.e. hair colour gender and height, would have a wife who is keeping a terminal illness from him, would you take that as substantial evidence for his claims?

More than likely you would need him to at least confirm YOUR name, your WIFE’s name and any other relevant facts that would establish that this man does in fact know a great deal about your life and may in fact be telling the truth about your wife.

The amount of evidence, and the limits you would place on something before you would consider it evidence in that situation is exactly what you need to do when considering fantastical claims like the existence of hell or even a god.

And then a few minutes later I received the following cryptic response:

check out the moons dust

After scratching my head for a minute thinking “WTF….?!” I resorted to Google and found that the “Moons Dust” argument is an old Young Earth Creationist Argument based on the amount of dust falling on the moon, which is seriously flawed as it was based upon 1960’s research. It has since been well disproved and I found one such site disproving it here.

I have since responded to this cryptic message including the link disproving the YEC rubbish, but my main beef is still with this moron’s severe lack of critical thinking. As I mentioned in my first message response to wfl18, the amount of evidence required, and the limits you would place on something before you would consider it evidence, to warrant belief in a given proposition should be at least equal to how incredulous the claim is. Sagan Russell’s Cosmic Teapot is a perfect example of this. One would need a significantly large amount of verifiable evidence to prove that there is in fact a teapot orbiting Saturn.

In closing, I’d like to reference part of the commentary on the “The Truth About Hell” website passed on to me by wfl18. The author, a fellow called Terry Watkins, says the following:

As you leave your body — you realize something is happening. You hear a sound. . . getting louder and louder. . . screaming . . .weeping. . . wailing. Terror and fear beyond anything you could imagine overtakes you. “This can’t be happening!” you scream. Your nostrils are filling with the awful stench of burning souls. Your face ignites from the heat. Flames are now blazing from your eyes, nostrils, ears, mouth — every opening in your body, flames are roaring out. Your body is sizzling and crackling from the flames.

First of all, when someone dies, their body dies, and so if the conventional religious attitude towards death and descent into in hell is that your soul is forever in torment, then how in the “hell” could someones body be “sizzling and crackling from the flames”?? The body is dead and still physically here in the mortal realm, so how do we get a new body in hell? Does the devil provide with a body just so we can feel pain? But if the human body is a gift from God, then surely only God can give us another one….wait…does God give us a new body so that we can feel the pain?

Obviously this is all just a bunch of hokum (to put it excruciatingly mildly) but aside from that conundrum, my other question is, what exactly does a human soul smell like when it’s burning….?

Oh, yeah, now I know…my soul regularly burns something vicious after consuming a meagre portion of baked beans. Clearly baked beans are the spawn of the devil!

Please people, open your damn minds!!

Peace,
dj357

Draft Agenda for Sunday

Here are a few ideas for things we might talk about at the next meeting. These are just my thoughts so please add suggestions and generally share your thoughts.

  1. Atheist Ireland – Those who attended the first meeting can talk about what took place, followed by a general discussion on how this effects the Mid-West Humanists. Do we want to affiliate?
  2. Structure of the MWH – At the moment Larry acts as a convener/chairman and has also sponsored the cost of meeting rooms. Do we want a more formal committee to run the group? How do we plan to pay for meeting rooms etc. going forward?
  3. Darwin Day – Do we want to organise an event on February 12th? If so what kind of event do we have the resources to plan and who is willing to be involved.
  4. Podcast – Are people interested in producing a podcast? Are we ready to produce a regular show?
  5. Speakers for next year – Are there any speakers we’d like for next year? What are the costs likely to be?

This is a fairly ambitious agenda and the Chair will need to keep people on topic but I think we can get through it.

Can you all let me know what you think?

Atheist Experience Reminder

As some of you know I’m something of a fan of the ACA‘s ‘The Atheist Experience‘ (as are some of the other posters here). The show is now available live via Ustream, the show airs on Sunday’s at 22.30 Irish time. 

I’ve embedded the stream below but if you go to the Ustream page you can participate in the text chat during the show.

Vodpod videos no longer available.

more about “The Atheist Experience, Ustream.TV: T…“, posted with vodpod

The Word – The Unbearable Lightness of Supreme Being

Vodpod videos no longer available.

Still a Lie (Portal, Still Alive parody)

All roads seem to lead to Jonathan Coulton at the moment…

via Atheist Nation

Friday Music – Jesus Christ

How do you feel about religious allusion in your music? I’m certainly a fan of the technique when it’s used as a cultural reference, but any overtly religious songs revolving around themes of devotion, (or worse, submission) have grated on me since I was a child being forced to sing about being unworthy whilst begging for mercy.

Since it’s Music Friday, I thought I’d share a band that causes me a bit of cognitive dissonance in this regard, hopefully opening the comments to some discussion.

The band I’m about to play are called Brand New, and I initially got into them because I like their style of self-indulgently long and tense buildups, dark imagery, and clever metaphors. After a while, it became clear that those clever lyrics that I was hearing weren’t actually what they were singing, such as the line in ‘Okay I believe you but my Tommy-gun don’t’:

We were contenders, now throwing the fight

which I heard as:

We were pretenders, now bona fide

In that one instance, what I was hearing was diametrically opposed to the original sentiment, which is surely a reflection of me hearing what I want to hear: a bit of optimism in an otherwise bleak song.

The song that I’ve embedded below is called Jesus Christ, and it was the first song I heard off their latest album, the Devil and God are Raging Inside Me.

At the time leading up to the album’s release, I was living in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, and they were set to play the song on the Conan O’Brien show. Just as the band were being introduced, a friend of mine who had heard the song before warned me that it was deeply religious, and I’d surely hate it. Before I had a chance to say anything in response, the opening notes started:

The song ended, and I spun to my friend who was now peering at me and sniped:

“Deeply religious?” Are you crazy? “We all have wood and nails?” They’re going to crucify the fucker! They’re taunting him!

Despite the shamefully condescending nature of my initial comment, I’m quite aware from the small pockets of discussion I’ve come across that believers point to this song as a mature example of faith in action, depicting a downtrodden, bitter soul who is lashing out at everything whilst still relying on the support of his martyred messiah.

Of course, when I listen to the lyrics, I’m inclined to think that the entire affair is dripping with irony, and by invoking the Jesus Christ character, the author is attempting to frame his hardships with a Biblical analogue.

For example, when I hear the line “So what did you do those three days you were dead”, it sounds insincere, making light of the perceived sacrifice that Christians tend to harp on about. Even the first line, “Jesus Christ, that’s a pretty face” strikes me as an exclamation of blasphemy, coupled with an odd phrase establishing that the words we hear are taking place inside someone’s head.

The line “Do I get the gold chariot? Do I float through the ceiling?” again seems quite insincere, quickly poking fun at the absurd notions of an afterlife that have existed throughout the aeons.

Anyhow – I won’t bore you any further with of my attempts to wrangle the interpretation I want out of the lyrics to a song I enjoy. I should just confess that it’s been two years since I first heard the song, and all that time I’ve deliberately avoided reading any interviews with the band, lest they confirm my fears that my interpretation relies on a heinous manipulation of the facts to worm my way out of an uncomfortable truth.

Deliberately avoiding potential dissonance-causing information is something that nobody should be proud of, but it’s one that I’m sure we’re all guilty of on some level. Then again, can you really begrudge me in this instance when the stakes are so low?

What songs do you have to reinterpret to enjoy? Are there songs you refuse to listen to based on lyrical content alone?

Friday Music – Helden (Heroes)

Hello all,

Here’s some more music for you:

Apocalyptica, a group of cellists who play rock and heavy metal with their cellos, got together with Till Lindemann, the lead singer of my favourite german band Rammstein, and recorded this re-imagining of David Bowie’s classic “Heroes”, with german lyrics, for their latest record “Worlds Collide”.

I found this fan video of this awesome song with German and English lyrics incorporated so you shouldn’t feel too lost, but I would encourage you to listen to it at least once without reading the words, as it is a very powerful song, even if you don’t understand the lyrics!

Enjoy!!

Friday Music

I always loved this music, perhaps it takes me back to my time on the very-same mountain in Scotland.  It’s by Sigur Ros